THE BELOW LETTER WAS WRITTEN BEFORE UNRAVELING THE KING OF DEMONS SERIAL KILLER BOYDEN GRAY CRIMINALLY INSANE HATE CRIME ADMINISTRATION. HE USES JUDGES AS PART OF HIS CRIME NETWORK. SEE: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/hijakjustice.html The Federalist Society, a Right-wing network of lawyers, judges and supporters, undoing civil rights and other gains made through the courts. ALSO, SEE SERIAL KILLER: Boyden Gray Address at the 2007 National Lawyers Convention 11-15-07 Opening remarks at the 2007 Annual National Lawyers Convention by Federalist Society Executive Vice President Leonard A. Leo followed by an address by Ambassador C. Boyden Gray http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8691590749515004704 March 7, 2007 To: Members of Congress Independent Ministers Across The Country Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciairy US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Mr. Emery, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Alberto Gonzalez, Attorney General US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office of Legal Affairs Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Jonathan Lippman Defrauding Chief Administrative Judge Office of Court Administration 25 Beaver Street New York, New York 10004-2982 RE: VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT /AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH WITH EVIDENCE, AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S TRESPASS AS A NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE AND HIS DOCUMENTED CRIMINAL REPITITIOUS, PATTERN AND PRACTICED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, USURPING POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS AND THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, EFFECTUATING THE BELOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN GLOBAL ODIOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND AGAINST EQUAL PROTECTIONS EMBEDDED IN GOD GIVEN AND CONSTITUTIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY RIGHTS: • DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, ( 18 USC SEC 371), EX:THE BELOW MENTIONED LEVENSON MATTER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL INVALID RULE 127, HIS APPEAL, HIS RULINGS IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE, UNCONSTITUIONAL USURPED COURT AND LEGISLATIVE POWERS AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS A PHENOMENON, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, ( 18 USC SEC. 1621), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, • I NSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2383) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS AMENDMENT, HIS APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC REDORD APPELLATE DIVISION DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, • SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2384 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS LAWLESSLY USURPED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND APPEAL, •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION LAWLESSLY IMPEDED AND OBSTRUCTED THE ASISTANCE OF COUNSELCONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED PROGRAM AND PAYMENT PLAN, • SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ENJOINING SUBORDINATE JUDGES IN HIS LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION VIA ENFORCING HIS PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED LAWLESS USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE 127, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY EFFECTUATING MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON MATTER, •FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT (18 USC SEC 1623) , EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) ; EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGENIC RACQUETEERING ENTERPRISES LISTED UNDER HIS NAME, • CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVERIEGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18, SECTION 241 )EX: OVER 13 MILLION DEADHERE AND ABROAD UNDER HIS NAME AND PATHOGENIC LEADERSHIP, PUBLIC PROTESTS VIA MULTIPLE LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON LAW SUIT, • U.S. CODE TITLE 10, SECTION 333, INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS, EX: THE DISREGARD OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DOCUMENTED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED AMENDMENT WHICH EFFECTUATED MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS AND DISTURBANCES IS A DIRECT INTERFERENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTIONS HAS EFFECTUATED OVER 13 MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD UNDER A JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION, COUPLED WITH LAWLESS UNRESTRAINED USURPATIONS, IS AN OBSTRUCTION WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND HAS CAUSED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE MULTIPLE LAWSUITS. THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, AS WELL AS THE DISREGARD OF EQUAL PROTECTIONS SECURED BY GOD AND THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRE INTERVENTION, • ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL, RULINGS, LAWLESS PUBLIC RECORD DOCUMENTED USURPATIONS AND AMMENDMENTS WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE ATTACHED LEVENSON MATTER AND ATTACHMENTS, •GENOCIDE ; ( B) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (C) DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (D) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (E) COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, EXAMPLE: THE ATTACHED GENOCIDAL DEADLY PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS PHENOMENON COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD AND DESTROY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A NATIONAL, ETHNICAL, RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS GROUP AS SUCH: (A) KILLING MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (B) CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY OR MENTAL HARM TO MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (C) DELIBERATELY INFLICTING ON THE GROUP CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO BRING ABOUT ITS PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART; (D) IMPOSING MEASURES INTENDED TO PREVENT BIRTHS WITHIN THE GROUP; Dear Public Officials: THIS Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is written pursuant to Almighty God the Creator God given rights so all people can live free from public record documented Jonathan Lippman, NYS Chief Administrative Judicial Trespasser criminal, seditious, odious scourge, usurpations MANDATING, REQUIRING, AUTHORIZING, his arrest, removal, and impeachment, accordingly. Jonathan Lippman’s heinous crimes, criminal usurpations, legal fiction administration, persistent and willful insurrection and rebellion against the New York and the United States of America Constitutions effectuated a deadly Public Defraud requiring his arrest as his actions and the attachments attached hereto epitomize his high misdemeanors, felonies, malfeasance in office and are documented public atrocities with genocidal and deadly power and control ramifications. See attached. Above all, I am filing this Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit against Jonathan Lippman with particularity to the fact that all persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness. These God given rights have been LAWLESSLY obstructed via lawless disregarded life threatening usurpations inflicted on humankind near and far. These crimes are documented in the above and below offices and documented in the public record of the below mentioned law suit. This Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is written with emphasis on TRUTHFUL DOCUMENTATION OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S verifiable crimes that defrauded and OVER THREW the United States system of government, for his power craze personal gain while trespassing as a judge in the law suit against him titled 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL. This criminal complaint is written on behalf of the people of New York State, Africa, and the sacredness of the protections guaranteed by God, to live free from lawless Jonathan Lippman usurpations and public disturbances, that obstruct justice, terrorize countries and people, as well as kill under varied disguises cited in the multiple documentaries I have written that are filed in the NYC FBI office, Chief Justice Judith Kaye’s office, and The Department of Investigations under NYC Mayor Bloomberg’s office via Rose Hearn, Commissioner. Additionally, I have attached evidence verifying the above Jonathan Lippman criminal activities, premised off of lawless disregarded public disturbance usurpations and his unregulated 2 billion dollar budget that facilitates such. I have been terrorized, denied all aspects of equal protection of the law, targeted for a disguised killing/wiped off this earth via lawless Jonathan Lippman documented patterned and practiced criminal usurpations, consistent with his patterns of lawless court administration, union interference, public education usurpations. Usurpations that have wiped out over 13 million people are listed under his name. His lawless usurpations including his public record Appellate Division documented lawless usurpation require arrest and additional charges for the disregard and seditious/defraud appeal. See attachments. For the last 13 years I have vigilantly fought off Jonathan Lippman’s persistent, malicious, lawless, lethal, documented usurpation pattern and practices that could have left me dead under several disguises and multiple times. The documentation of his criminal usurpations by the NYS Appellate Division is in God’s order, was authorized and is needed. Additionally, the Documentaries I have forwarded to authorities regarding Jonathan Lippman’s patterned public record lawless usurpations require an end to the disregard of his documented criminal usurpations, as over 13 million people are dead under his lawless public record usurpation patterns, that are listed under his name. Foremost, this Criminal Complaint Truth Affidavit is mainly for his documented criminal unconstitutional usurpations, via fictional administrative rulings, unauthorized amendments, and his unauthorized seditious appeal in the above matter that is in contravention to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, and is seditious, treasonous, and defrauds the American people and the United States of America government. This Criminal Complain Truth Affidavit is about arresting Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal unconstitutional usurpations. The dangers of usurpations are premised off of evils through amendments to the Constitution and fictional administration of law, as exemplified in the Levenson matter case titled: 1 No. 1: Leonard J. Levenson, et al. v. Jonathan Lippman,&c., et al. In this case the system of checks and balances has been obstructed via Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional usurpations, constructions, amendments and fictional administration. Jonathan Lippman’s actions, fictional rulings, and amendment in the above matter are documented unconstitutional usurpations. His appeal in the above matter is an act of sedition where he conspired to overthrow the Constitutional Government and delayed the execution of laws. His unconstitutional appeal and amendment perjured his oath of office and demonstrated his willfulness in conspiring to offend and defraud the United States of America for unauthorized power and control. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s appeal in the above cited Levenson matter is documentation of FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT and he clearly abused and enjoined the Second Circuit Court of Appeals for his RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME via his 2 billion dollar unregulated budget and his control position as an administrator of the judiciary which effectuated having his criminal usurpations disregarded, in violation of the SUPREMACY CLAUSE. Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional amendment and appeal in the above mentioned matter violate the below cited Supremacy Clause and are treasonous acts. THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE The Supremacy Clause, United States Constitutional Article VI declares that all laws made in pursuance of the Constitution and all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land and shall enjoy legal superiority over any conflicting provision of a State constitution or law. The Operation of the Supremacy Clause: When Congress legislates pursuant to its delegated powers, conflicting state law and policy must yield. In the above cited Levenson matter, this did not happen. The disregard of documented lawless criminal usurpations is a violation of the Supremacy Clause. Moreover, the Jonathan Lippman criminal usurpation disregards are the direct reason New York State courts and government are operating against the people, and causing public outcries as exemplified in the Levenson matter. Obligation of State Courts under the Supremacy Clause The Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States are as much a part of the law of every State as its own local laws and constitution. Their obligation ''is imperative upon the state judges, in their official and not merely in their private capacities. From the very nature of their judicial duties, they would be called upon to pronounce the law applicable to the case in judgment. They were not to decide merely according to the laws or Constitution of the State, but according to the laws and treaties of the United States--'the supreme law of the land'.'' State courts are bound then to give effect to federal law when it is applicable and to disregard state law when there is a conflict; federal law includes, of course, not only the Constitution and congressional enactments and treaties but as well the interpretations of their meanings by the United States Supreme Court. Jonathan Lippman via lawless usurpations has created a system of government where the law does not matter. He has lawlessly usurped power in all aspects of government, particularly in the courts, as exemplified in this criminal complaint premised off his documented usurpation crimes in the Levenson matter. He has lawlessly usurped power to dupe the people, obstruct justice, inflict legal fiction administration as a means of operation, while enforcing rulings/orders and amendments with no Constitutional authority. The evidence is in the criminal state of New York’s legal system status and the public cries for justice by the people and for the people, as exemplified in the above cited matter and the attachments affixed hereto. Congress created laws to help eradicate organized crime from social fabric by divesting association of fruits of ill-gotten gains. Primary intent of Congress was to combat infiltration of organized crime into legitimate businesses operating in interstate commerce. Jonathan Lippman’s fictional administration of law and unconstitutional administration of fictions as rulings, amendments and appeals, as exemplified in the attachments are predicated off of unconstitutional criminal raqueteering usurpations. An example of such is outlined in the Levenson law suit where the Appellate Division rendered its constitutionally compliant decision, documenting Jonathan Lippman’s criminal usurpations. Thereafter, Jonathan Lippman filed his documented seditious appeal overthrowing the Constitutional government, which was proximate cause of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that conflicts with the Supremacy clause. Jonathan Lippman’s patterned raqueteering practices were the proximate cause of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in contravention to the Supremacy Clause. These acts in themselves exemplify Jonathan Lippman’s abnormal power crazed fictional administration to unconstitutionally usurp power divested in the courts. As noted above and in the attachments Jonathan Lippman has participated in a pattern of criminal usurpations and racketeering activity. Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of fraud had foreseeable results, in that when he filed his seditious appeal, he knew he had control over the courts via his trespass as Chief Administrative Justice and his unregulated budget, which consequently effectuated an unconstitutional validation of his criminal usurpation disguised as an amendment/appeal. By virtue of implementation of Lippman’s scheme of fraud, it is clear, that he expects the people of New York to stay complacent and allow the continuity or threat of continuing racketeering usurpation acts. This can not happen as each public official this criminal complaint is filed with has a public duty oath to do their homework and enforce the Supremacy clause and equal protection of the law on behalf of the public safety of the courts, and government as a whole. Jonathan Lippman’s appeal and amendment are not authorized. Jonathan Lippman’s criminal conduct, specifically his seditious appeal and amendment, rebelling against the constitutional authority and the misprision of treason of such, enable him to have interest and control of the court enterprise. If this continues, the Second Circuit Court of appeals judges will have rendered their freedom and sovereignty of themselves and the public trust of the people over to Jonathan Lippman under his diabolical scheme of fraud, deceit and duping via lawless Jonathan Lippman usurped amendments/rulings with no Constitutional authority. The remedy of such is Jonathan Lippman’s arrest, removal and impeachment for his documented criminal acts, with particularity his documented scheme to offend and defraud the United States via his ongoing and documented lawless usurpations and patterned and practiced seditious and insurrection rulings, amendments, appeals, and fictions against and defrauding the United States of America and New York Constitutional authority, as well as his acts against the people. See the attachments. Jonathan Lippman is administering an obstruction of justice NYS court system premised off of usurping lawless powers and defrauding the American people and is using the judiciary to subterfuge his crimes. His 2 billion dollar unregulated budget is being used to unconstitutionally obstruct, subvert, and destroy the New York State Constitutional authority and intelligence of the people. The decision that rendered Jonathan Lippman’s unconstitutional usurpations as valid has no Constitutional authority, is in direct violation of the Supremacy Clause, which further mandates the need for his arrest, removal and impeachment, because when he appealed the constitutionality of the Supremacy clause, he committed treason, as he should have known the Supremacy Clause regardless of what is stated in his unconstitutional rulings, the Supremacy clause states that when there is a controversy, the state laws yield. In summary, Jonathan Lippman’s fictional ruling, his amendment and appeal in the above Levenson matter, have no Constitutional authority, subvert the Constitution, obstruct the legal assistance program, delay payments for services rendered, advance oppression, undermine the integrity of the judiciary’s individual judge’s ability to calculate numbers, facilitates divide and conquer stratagems, and sneakily inflicts similar results to the eugenic agenda listed under his name. Jonathan Lippman’s use of the court via fictional rulings, amendments, and lawless usurpations, to advance similar eugenic results of the programs listed under his name has no place in New York Government. Another example of Jonathan Lippman’s Conspiracy to Offend and Defraud the United States is in the below excerpts from the Levenson matter. The below excerpts state that: This practice prompted protests from localities responsible for paying these enhanced awards. This is the clearest fraud there is, because the low attorney fees paid to help the people is what prompted protests which effectuated the multiple law suits against Jonathan Lippman being consolidated into the Levenson matter. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurped power caused the multiple law suits, public protests, and public cries. Never in the history of New York was the integrity of the judiciary so undermined that lawyers had to sue the courts over Jonathan Lippman’s newly erupted home made unauthorized rule. The creation of the above fiction has no validation or authority, and was created to subterfuge Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation and intervention in matters the individual judges and the courts are equipped and constitutionally mandated to handle. Jonathan Lippman’s inflicted lawlessness via his unauthorized unconstitutional ruling had a domino effect. His seditious unauthorized ruling effectuated multiple law suits because the procedure for lawyers to get paid for constitutionally protected and required services were lawlessly obstructed, impeded, usurped, and interfered with. Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized ruling prompted public protests such as multiple law suits filed against him for usurping unconstitutional powers he does not legitimately possess. The above excerpt from the Levenson matter is a fiction created to cover up Jonathan Lippman’s seditious ruling that caused the public protests. Above all, the above statement is an imaginative fiction that creates reason for Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation and unwarranted interference. It is a form of creative writing that is supposed to further defraud from truth, that the public protests were the law suits filed due to the unconstitutional usurped Jonathan Lippman lawless, power and control, havoc causing, non validated, unauthorized, unconstitutional ruling. The rates were ultimately increased so who and what localities prompted protests? How come enhance awards were not protested or a problem until Jonathan Lippman’s trespass as a NYS judge inflicting unconstitutional, lawlessly usurped, fictional ruling? If the increased rates prompted protests why were they thereafter increased substantially? What validation exists to substantiate the above enhanced awards Jonathan Lippman created fiction? The validation that Jonathan Lippman’s power crazed, money control, unconstitutional, seditious, lawless usurpation prompted protests is the filing of multiple law suits against Jonathan Lippman for such. These are the only documented verified public protests on record. The above fiction excerpt, distorts truth, facilitates defrauding and duping the American people, has no validation, and exemplifies the fictional, lawlessly usurped, method of operation under the lawless administration and usurpations of Jonathan Lippman’s trespass as a NYS Chief Administrator. Another example of Jonathan Lippman defrauds and conspiracy to over throw the constitutional government is the below excerpt: There was, however no mechanism to review these enhanced awards, either judicially or administratively. The above excerpt is not true and or validated by Constitutional authority. It is a farce. The trial judges via Constitutional authority had and have been ruling on the awards. This above fiction serves to only subterfuge and creates reason for Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation, unauthorized interference with individual courts, and abnormal power craze obsession to supervise the trial judge’s competency and discretion. This act in itself undermines the integrity of the judges and the judicial system as a whole. If a judge does not have the ability to decide on awards and or enhanced awards than the person should not hold the position of judge. There is no Constitutional authority to support the above newly erupted enhanced review Jonathan Lippman created usurpation quest problem. The above review problem is not validated, is another example of creative writing, disregards enhance review award past practices, and is nothing more than power hungry control over trial judges and undermines the integrity of the judiciary. Moreover it puts the judges and lawyers in the assistance program lawlessly at Jonathan Lippman’s mercy while having no authority to do so. Above all, it lawlessly undermines the individual judge’s and the Appellate Division’s power and enjoins the court system in Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of defraud, insurrection and sedition. Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized rulings, amendment, appeal, and usurpations defraud the people, perjure his oath of office, are acts of sedition and insurrection against the Constitutional authority of the court system. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation administration impede due exercise of rights by preventing, obstructing, and impeding justice and constitutional rights as epitomized in the Levenson case. Specifically, Jonathan Lippman’s enhanced award created problem, obstructed and impeded justice via denying and or delaying Constitutionally protected rights embedded in paying assigned counsel for services rendered. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations have advanced by silent and gradual attacks upon constitutional safeguards. Never before in human history, has the head of a constitutional government who had sworn to protect, preserve, and defend its fundamental provisions publicly advised his subversion through administrative action and through judicial interpretation. Unless the people are stirred to recognition of the danger of such usurpations, they will never be checked and will continue. The arrest for the above charges is authorized by law, is not discretionary and or needing interpretation. The facts are clear. Jonathan Lippman has defrauded the United States as noted in his false declarations filed as an appeal. His appeal is an obvious attempt to over throw the government via lawlessly usurped unconstitutional powers. In Jonathan Lippman’s continued quest for lawless power and authority, that he does not possess, by his own actions, his appeal primarily, in the Levenson law suit against him, he failed to support the New York and United States of America Constitutions and perjured his oaths of office as a judge. He rebelled against Constitutional authority for his personal gain and used the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to cover his defraud and rebellion against Constitutional authority. In so-doing he invoked the self-executing sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment, vacated his office, and forfeited all salaries, pensions and benefits. His unconstitutional usurpations, specifically, his unauthorized appeal, his unauthorized rule 127.b , his unauthorized rulings, in the attached law suit and exhibits present beyond a preponderance of the evidence and proof that his unconstitutional usurpations far exceeded the standard and are criminal acts of treason, insurrection and sedition. Specifically, in the attached Levenson law suit, Jonathan Lippman usurped legislative powers and functions; and failed to uphold the separation of powers as clearly set forth in the Constitution's model for our government. This is indisputable and requires no interpretation. It requires public official homework, review and arrest. Jonathan Lippman’s insurrection and rebellion against the Constitutional authority and the integrity of the court system can not be subterfuged by local level rules, ordinances, and or fictions that are in contravention to the Constitution. This would only mount to further misprision of treason and felonies by failing to report treason and commission of felonies when so noted as established in 18 USC Sections 2382 and Section 4. Pursuant to public officials sworn and bound oath, both this Nation and this state are Constitutional Republics. A Republic is rule by law, and not by men. The Supreme Law of this land is the American Constitution, by which all limited, delegated authority for government exists. What is not specifically authorized in the Constitution is prohibited by the Constitution. There are no exceptions. Further, the Constitutions are written in English, so no interpretation is necessary. They say what they mean, and mean what they say. Since Jonathan Lippman has difficulty understanding the plain, simple and direct language of the Constitutions, then he is not fit to occupy a public office which is charged with serving the Public Trust, or to wield so much assumed power over the People for whom he works and by whom he is paid. The American Citizen is sovereign in this Nation, not that government or court, pursuant to oaths taken, sworn to support the Constitution and serve the Citizen. No sovereignty is delegated by the Constitution to the machinery of the National and State governments, or divisions thereof. Sovereignty is inherent in the People and governmental powers are derived from the People, and the People, for good reason, did not delegate sovereign powers to the government. The only sovereignty associated with the States is that arising from the true nature of the State, which is the People, the body politic. When Jonathan Lippman was trespassing as a judge, it was his duty to uphold the Constitution, the powers thereof and the Rights guaranteed therein, yet he by his lawless usurpations, rulings, amendments, and actions, in each of the exhibits attached, acts in perjury of his oath and in defiance of the Constitution. Article III of the Constitution states that judges may serve in times of good behavior. Jonathan Lippman’s attached repetitiously unconstitutional usurpations and fictional rulings, denying the Constitution and Rights guaranteed therein to American Citizens, who claimed Rights before the court, is not serving in good behavior. Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U. S., 436. None of the procedures, rules, regulations and rulings of Jonathan Lippman which deny Constitutional Rights or which are not in compliance with the Constitution are valid, lawful, or have any force or effect whatsoever. Jonathan Lippman, by his orders in the Levenson matter, violated the above cited Supreme Court ruling and Citizens Rights since he created several legal fiction rulings in contravention to the Constitution. Jonathan Lippman is obligated to follow the law of the land, which he has failed to do, and has no Constitutional or legislative authority to create or change law. Jonathan Lippman’s fictional orders in the attached Levenson case are criminal in nature, unconstitutional and fail. The defraud in the Levenson case is exemplified in placing authority back in the courts where it Constitutionally belonged all the time and was subverted by Jonathan Lippman’s power crazed obsessions, unconstitutional fictional rulings, and psychotic repetitious public defraud against the United States and its Sovereign Citizens, including defrauding and undermining the integrity and intelligence of the trial court judges. Jonathan Lippman’s rebellion against the Constitution, Treason against the American People and violation of the public trust as well as his denial of his oath is published on the public record in the Levenson matter via his unconstitutional amendment and appeal. The below is another example of nonverified, non validated, and a usurpation created obstruction. By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. This is clear fraud as the trial judges had prescribed awards as constitutionally allowed, before Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized usurpations. Moreover, Jonathan Lippman’s criminal usurpations are not supported by any Constitutional law. I challenge Jonathan Lippman and or any public official to verify and validate the Constitutional authority he used to inflict and enforce his rule 127.2 b fiction and his lawless appeal. The Jonathan Lippman legal fiction amendment can not be verified and or validated. It is a legal fiction with no Constititutional authority. It is an unconstitutional usurpation created to cause havoc, lawlessly take power away from judges, take power out of law and place it in a man, deny/delay and usurp the payment plan for Constitutionally required services for the poor at the mercy of Jonathan Lippman as opposed to at the entitlement of the law. Jonathan Lippman has an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget. Yet, these cases taking court time have been enforced to fight for minimum monies for constitutionally required services. These havoc causing Jonathan Lippman criminal unconstitutional usurpations can not be taken lightly as they have longstanding lawless power and control, advancing oppression, and divide and conquer effects that need to be addressed criminally, as authorized by law and publicly as needed. The amounts are minimal in comparison to Jonathan Lippman’s unregulated budget, yet he wants this control mechanism to eugenically, maliciously, deny people funds for services rendered to help the poor. This type of administration uses lawless usurpations to defraud people, obstruct government, impede the legal assistance programming, and interfere with federal and state laws, via deny constitutional assistance of counsel to those entitled. Jonathan Lippman’s lawlessly usurped amendment deliberately places the funding of constitutionally protected services in his lawless and usurped control. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurped amendment has no Constitutional authority validating its administration. In fact, Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized usurped amendment is the direct cause of the multiple law suits that erupted in the Levenson matter. Jonathan Lippman’s usurped lawless fiction amendment is unauthorized, inconsistent with protections embedded in the 14th amendment, and has impeded and obstructed due exercise of rights via impede and delay payment for Constitutionally protected services. Jonathan Lippman has masterminded, orchestrated, and administered a eugenic, racist, usurpation amendment that obstructs justice and good faith community efforts to help people and impedes the paying for such services. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s unauthorized amendment expands oppression by not paying professionals in a timely manner, further oppresses the oppressed by obstructing constitutionally protected services, and lawlessly places the financial control of the legal assistance program in his usurped power. These actions are beyond defrauding, they are criminal seditious acts to over throw Constitutional authority embedded in Equal Protection of the law. His amendment is worthless, invalid, unauthorized, and interferes with state and federal laws. The below excerpts epitomize Jonathan Lippman’s scheme of fraud and criminal usurpations in the Levenson matter. The first excerpt states that there is no provision for reviewing excessive compensation awards. The below excerpts identify the Constitutional provisions for review of excessive compensation awards. This is called a documented Conspiracy to Defraud the people of the United States and documented insurrection against the Constitution by engaging in rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America via fraud and defraud. •By making no provision in the County Law for any review of excessive compensation awards, the Legislature simply created a gap in the administrative process that the Chief Administrator was entitled to fill. The above fiction is not validated, is unauthorized and is in conflict with truth. It is simply not true because the Constitution via legislative power authorizes the trial judges to review awards, as well as past practices. •Prior to the amendment, Rule 127.2 (b) provided that, upon proper application to review an award of enhanced attorney's fees, the trial judge could reconsider the award in consultation with the appropriate administrative judge. The final determination of the fees, however, remained with the trial judge. •In pertinent part, the proposed legislation read, "Any order of a trial court determining a claim for compensation or reimbursement hereunder shall be subject to review in the court having appellate jurisdiction of the action in which the claim was made upon application of the claimant or the political subdivision upon which payment of the claim is a charge. The appellate court shall provide for the expedited determination of such application and may confirm, increase, or decrease the compensation or reimbursement awarded." Jonathan Lippman’s usurped amendment has no constitutional authority, is an example of perjury against his oath, is seditious, insurrects rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America Government, is in contravention to the Supremacy Clause, destroys walls of protection, has interfered with state and federal laws, impedes due exercise of rights by attempting to impede with same, and effectuated a conspiracy against rights as exemplified in the two attachments titled: In Pay Disputes, Some Lawyers For the Poor Refuse Cases and For the Poor, A Lawyer with 1600 Clients. Jonathan Lippman’s amendment is unconstitutional since it impermissibly usurps that power expressly reserved by the New York State Constitution to the New York State Legislature and impinges on the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court as provided by the New York State Legislature. Jonathan Lippman’s criminal unauthorized, unconstitutional, usurped fictional administration has longstanding eugenic ramifications consistent with other inflicted oppression programs listed under his name and with his two billion dollar unregulated budget. County L Section 722-b of the County Law governs the compensation rates for attorneys who participate in the Assigned Counsel Plan. During the period relevant to this case, County Law 722-b provided that attorneys participating in the Assigned Counsel Plan be compensated at a rate not to exceed $25 per hour for work performed outside of court and $40 per hour for work performed in court, plus reasonable expenses. The provision further imposed a cap of $800 for misdemeanor cases and $1,200 for felony cases and all appellate matters.[1] However, upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances." JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DEFRAUD SCHEME FOR LAWLESS POWER OVER THE JUDGES AND OVER THE FINANCING OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL PROGRAM, IS CRIMINALLY SEDITIOUS. IT IS FRAUD ON THE COURTS, THE JUDGES AND THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK STATE. THE ABOVE EXCERPT IS THE CLEAREST CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION FOR REVIEW OF EXCESSIVE COMPENSATION AWARDS. JONATHAN LIPPMAN INSURRECTED AND REBELLED AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK STATE GOVERNMENT TO LAWLESSLY USURP POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS AND USED THAT LAWLESS POWER TO INFILTRATE THE NY COURTS WITH HIS DOCUMENTED PERSONAL EUGENIC PLAN OF DESTRUCTION SIMILAR TO THE ONE LISTED UNDER HIS NAME UNDER DEADLY PATHOGENS. THIS IS BEYOND A DISTURBANCE IT IS A HITLER PLAN OF DESTRUCTION VIA DOCUMENTED GENOCIDAL CONSPIRACY, DEFRAUD, INSURRECTION, REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH EUGENIC IMPACTS CONSISTENT WITH OTHER JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENA. “Upon application to the court, compensation in excess of these statutory limits could be paid upon a showing of "extraordinary circumstances." WHAT PART OF THIS IS NOT IN ENGLISH? HE HAS MADE MY LIFE MISERABLE AND I WAS RIGHT ALL THE TIME. HE IS A DISGUISED KILLER NUTCASE. HE DEFIED, DEFRAUDED, BETRAYED THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEW YORK STATE AND LAWLESSLY USURPED POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS TO INFLICT HIS EUGENIC PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION ACTIONS IN AFRICA ARE CONSISTENT WITH HIS LAWLESS USURPATIONS IN THE LEVENSON MATTER. THE PHENOMENON LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME DESTROYED A NATURALLY RICH IN RESOURCES COUNTRY OVER THIS PYCHOTIC’S GREED, ABNORMAL POWER AND CONTROL OBSESSIONS, AND JONATHAN LIPPMAN SHOULD BE HUNG, BUT OH FOR GOD’S GRACE AND MERCY. I WAIT TO VISIT JONATHAN LIPPMAN IN JAIL WITH MY BIBLE. HE SOLD HIS SOUL AND WAS DECEIVED! THE EARTH BELONGS TO ALMIGHTY GOD THE CREATOR OF ALL! JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS TRIED TO HAVE ME KILLED UNDER MULTIPLE DISGUISES FOR THE LAST 13 YEARS, AND ALL MY HELP CAME AND COMES FROM GOD! NO EQUAL PROTECTION OF MAN MADE LAWS WAS PROVIDED. WHY? THE BELOW EXCERPT SHOWS HOW JONATHAN LIPPMAN UPROOTED, OBSTRUCTED, IMPEDED, AND INTERFERED WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND TRIED TO TURN GOOD JUDGES INTO BAD ONES. JONATHAN LIPPMAN NOT ONLY UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT SYSTEM, HE OBSTRUCTED THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT SYSTEM AND OF THE UNITED STATES. HE DELIBERATELY INFLICTED EUGENICAL GLOBAL WARFARE. These assigned counsel rates, in effect since 1986, have worked a hardship upon the assigned counsel system as the number of attorneys willing to participate in the program severely decreased because the fees were inadequate. At the same time, the number of individuals in need of assigned representation increased, causing many trial courts to struggle to find attorneys willing to represent indigent defendants in criminal proceedings. There arose a growing concern that the lack of attorneys available to represent indigent criminal defendants threatened to deny such individuals their federal and state constitutional rights. To alleviate the problem, a number of trial judges authorized enhanced compensation awards for assigned counsel. These judges concluded that the loss of attorneys from the assigned counsel panels due to the existing rate structure constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying an enhanced hourly rate to ensure the availability of qualified attorneys to provide constitutionally required representation. All judges and other public officers are required to swear an oath, and be bound thereby, to support the Constitution of the United States of America. Article III requires judges to serve in times of “good behavior” and making rulings consistent with the Constitution is serving in good behavior. The opposite is not. The attached law suit against Jonathan Lippman clearly establishes the ramifications of his fictional, power crazed, amendment inconsistent with the Constitution, which effectuated public protests via multiple law suits. This is not good behavior. Lawful rulings must be based in constitutionally compliant law or case. See the Supremacy Clause. Jonathan Lippman’s attached unconstitutional usurpations assumes that he, himself, is higher law and has higher authority than the Supreme Law of this land, the Constitution of the United States of America. This is staggering typical arrogance and the underlying criminality has obstructed varied parts of government and requires arrest. I limit my description of his unlawful, criminal and unconstitutional acts because they are too ruthless, deadly and extensive. However, see the attachments and the above mentioned Documentaries I have written based on Jonathan Lippman research. Too many Americans have given their last full measure of devotion for this Nation in the many wars to save other people in other lands and protect their rights, and are still doing so this very day. For true, Americans to allow Jonathan Lippman and or any other public officer to violate Rights and enforce unconstitutional usurpations, against American Citizens, while American servicemen and women die in foreign lands to protect the rights of others totally, violates any and all concept of freedom for which America is supposed to stand for. Virtually everything Jonathan Lippman presented in the attached Levenson law suit was done in the regular and usual business operations of the government of New York, inflicted with Jonathan Lippman’s usual customs and practices of unconstitutional, unlawful, fraudulent, actions and operations, based in fraud, deception, lies, non-existent "laws", rules, regulations, codes, etc., which have no Constitutional or lawful bearing or application, whatsoever. Pursuant to Jonathan Lippman’s sworn and bound oaths, his unconstitutional usurpations, as noted in the Levenson lawsuit and the attachments, Jonathan Lippman has betrayed the Public Trust, which he is duty bound to uphold, and his unlawful actions also defy the laws of this state, yet, he has usurped unconstitutional power to demand other judges, ( see the Cheryl Coleman case and Laura Blackburne, Matter of Blackburne, 7 NY3d 213, 2006 cases attached) and citizens of this state, for whom he works and by whom he is paid, strictly abide by unlawful, unconstitutional "laws", rules, regulations, etc., which he fraudulently imposed upon them, under threat and coercion, and to which they are not liable. Fraud and deceit are not law, no matter what is stated, by and through its claims. The Constitution provides only limited delegated powers, which cannot lawfully and constitutionally exceed, nor Jonathan Lippman assume powers not specifically delegated. In the attached Levenson law suit against Jonathan Lippman, one clearly sees Jonathan Lippman’s obstruction of justice, malfeasance, and detraction from the dignity of the judiciary via his unconstitutional amendment that prompted protests from localities and attorneys which filed multiple law suits against him because his newly created amendment has no Constitutional authority, lawlessly usurps power and has no good faith meaning. The most compelling evidence against Jonathan Lippman’s crimes in the attached lawsuit is his lawless, fictional and unconstitutional rulings and actions in contrary to public policy. Jonathan Lippman usurped Constitutional power to create, implement and administer a system of injustice that obstructed statutorily entitled assistance of counsel for individuals charged with crimes. This exemplifies in the clearest form Jonathan Lippman’s conspiracy to offend and defraud the United States, by having an oath to uphold the Constitution, but acting to destroy it and fellow citizen’s rights protected in it. The above cited Jonathan Lippman acts epitomize perjury against his oath of office by obstructing and subverting Constitutional authority and requirements. Insurrection against the Constitution is demonstrated by his appeal which incites assists and engages in rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America. Jonathan Lippman’s sedition/seditious conspiracy by conspiring to overthrow the constitutional government or delay the execution of a law of the United States of America is exemplified in his unconstitutional amendment and unconstitutional appeal which impede due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct, and interfere with Constitutionally protected rights embedded in assistance of counsel for those charged with crimes. He literally obstructed justice to administer a fictional ruling with discriminatory, eugenic, and malicious ramifications and impacts. In the attached law suit against Jonathan Lippman, he masterminded and administered fictional, unconstitutional and malicious rulings that subverted Constitutionally required services. The multiple lawsuits against Jonathan Lippman were caused by his unconstitutional new unauthorized amendment. This clearly undermines the integrity of the judiciary. He used his position as a judge to usurp power to retard, subvert and obstruct Constitutionally required assistance. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminality can not be taken lightly as his actions undermine the integrity of the judiciary, undermine public trust, and are contrary to public policy. Above all, his fictional rulings are unconstitutional, obstruct justice and lack specific constitutional or statutory provision granting authority for his actions. Another example of Jonathan Lippman’s criminal trespass as a judge, specializing in usurpation matters is his using his judicial role to intimidate local government by enjoining in matters specializing in usurping. This matter is the Greens at Half Hollow, LLC v Town of Huntington case. Although he is a Plaintiff in the matter, he used his position as Chief Justice to intimidate a usurpation matter. The usurpation specialist was used to regulate usurpation. In this matter he is a usurpation specialist, with usurpation regulatory intimidation power. This requires scrutiny and review. Moreover I challenge Jonathan Lippman to identify by name and address all persons, corporations, associations, or any other parties having an interest in the legal proceedings regarding the alleged usurpation. I challenge that he can not provide verification that he was authorized to act as the usurpation regulator and plaintiff in the above cited matter. These lawless usurpations and legal abuse intimidations, divest power from people, and are premised off of Jonathan Lippman personal gain and power craze criminal acts and agenda for New York State. Soon all of New York will lawlessly be controlled by Jonathan Lippman’s lawless intimidations, schemes of fraud and defraud and impede in local level government while trespassing as a judge. So far, Jonathan Lippman’s above acts violate: •Section 100.01 A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary •Section 100.02 A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities •Section 100.03 A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently. •Section 100.04 A judge shall so conduct the judge's extra-judicial activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations •Section 100.05 A judge or candidate for elective judicial office shall refrain from inappropriate political activity. Another Jonathan Lippman unauthorized lawless usurpation that I have reviewed is the attached Jonathan Lippman September 22, 2005 letter to Alan Hevesi, New York State Comptroller. Jonathan Lippman’s letter lawlessly usurps power, abuses judicial power, and cites no lawful Constitutional authority to validate his obstructing justice, usurped, power hungry, uncalled for recommendations. Mr. Havesi’s letter to Jonathan Lippman dated June 7, 2005 cites Constitutional authority and yet the Constitutional authority was over looked and lawless usurped power was still attempted by Jonathan Lippman on September 22, 2005. These abnormal power craze, intimidation, judicial abusive practices, Constitutionally unauthorized Jonathan Lippman acts require public sanctioning, as he is acting without any Constitutional authority and abusing local laws and his position to lawlessly usurp power. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations obstruct governmental administration, overthrow Constitutional walls of protection, are seditious acts attempting to over throw the constitutional government and impede due exercise of rights by attempting to interfere with same. Another example of Jonathan Lippman fictional administration that undermines the integrity of the judiciary and inflicts havoc is the attached letter to Jonathan Lippman dated March 27, 2006 by Andrea Masley. This letter documents Jonathan Lippman’s fictional administration of “catch 22” rulings which obstruct governmental administration, overthrow the Constitutional government, impede due exercise of rights, dismantle governmental walls of protection, and removes power of the law and places it in a man. The Constitutional authority of this ruling is questionable as it has effectuated usurped power seeking resolution from Jonathan Lippman as opposed to resolution based on law or laws. Another Jonathan Lippman fictional and defrauding administrative act requiring public scrutiny as to the authority and rationale, is the attached New York Times March 2, 2007 Metro Briefing Article, New York: Brooklyn: Judge Reorganizes Investigative Offices. This defraud appears as if a Brooklyn judge reorganized the investigative offices, when in reality Jonathan Lippman did and he did so under unknown authority. After widespread reports of judicial wrongdoing, Jonathan Lippman minimized via consolidation, the judicial investigative unit. This is sick, has no Constitutional validation and exemplifies Jonathan Lippman’s quest to silence his documented treason, perjury against his oath, acts of sedition, and Conspiracy to Defraud and offend the United States. There are two Jonathan Lippman phenomena I would like to call attention to. One is his attached first page of his report on the New York State Unified Court System Filing By Electronic Means and Filing By Facsimile Transmission Pilot Programs dated April 1, 2002. The coversheet is dated. The second page where he describes court administration as a PHENOMENON is not dated. Jonathan Lippman defines this court administration project as a phenomenon, just like his name was used to define the attached multiple genocidal deadly pathogen programs, as a PHENOMENON. I welcome an explanation for these vocabulary phenomena. Jonathan Lippman’s administration of the courts, while his name is listed under deadly pathogen programs that have left over 13 million people dead under a phenomenon, requires investigation under the above cited charges, with emphasis on his Conspiracy to Defraud the United States 18, USC Section 371. There are over 13 million people dead under Jonathan Lippman’s name and definition of a phenomena while he has an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget and a has a public record documented history of lawlessly usurping power that inflicts oppression. How did this happen? Equal protection and enforcement of the law is beyond required as the ramifications of the above are beyond disturbances and are beyond probable causes for Genocide charges. It is my prayer that these similarities will be investigated and the inflicted pathogen administration will be dismantled. Above all, I seek protection from his public record documented lawless usurpation patterns and practices as he has used all of New York State government to retaliate against a witness via ongoing inflicted usurped lawlessness documented in affidavits sent to Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General’s office, Chief Judge Judith Kayes office, and NYC FBI’s office, and Commissioner Rose Hearn’s office of NYC Department of Investigations, as well as other offices. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless pathogenic usurpations are not just eugenic. The lawless usurpation practices are used to kill white people as well, although the emphasis is on black people. This is a psychotic power and control mechanism, defined as divide and conquer, while I usurp lawless control. It is psychotic, but it works. Moreover, the disregard of documented criminal and deadly lawless usurpations is the ramifications of communities being controlled by Jonathan Lippman’s unregulated budget as opposed to equal protections embedded in safety, freedom, and exercising God given rights to correct man made wrongs. I can not fault the system. I fault the people in the system that disregarded documented crimes and allowed Jonathan Lippman’s criminal and deadly usurpations to continue. I sympathize for the warriors, black and white, that have been killed under this Jonathan Lippman documented lawless usurpation disregard phenomena. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal usurpations will end because God is God and no criminal in history from Biblical days to today has ever reigned for ever. I simply pray for the innocent people who will continue to fall prey to Jonathan Lippman’s multifaceted criminal lawless usurpations that have effectuated ruthless public disturbances, beyond public protests and exemplified in over 13 million people dead under pathogen programs in his name and under his definition of phenomena. I welcome Jonathan Lippman’s explanation of this. Additionally, Jonathan Lippman’s public record lawless usurpations, the attachments, the deadly pathogen programs in his name, violate the basic rules of judicial conduct. A JUDGE SHALL CONDUCT ALL OF THE JUDGE'S JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES SO THAT THEY DO NOT: 1.CAST DOUBT ON THE JUDGE'S CAPACITY TO ACT IMPARTIALLY AS A JUDGE; 2.DEMEAN THE JUDICIAL OFFICE; 3.INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIAL DUTIES; OR 4.VIOLATE THE JUDGE'S OATH AND OBLIGATION TO UPHOLD THE LAWS AND CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF THE NEW YORK. JONATHAN LIPPMAN HAS: 1.FAILED TO UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY BY FAILING TO OBSERVE HIGH STANDARDS OF CONDUCT, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.1 OF THE RULES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (22 NYCRR). 2.FAILED TO AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPORPRIETY AND HAS FAILED TO ACT IN A MANNER THAT PROMOTES PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE INTEGRITY AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.2 ( A) 3.FAILED TO PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY IN THAT HE HAS FAILED TO BE FAITHFUL TO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, THE CONSTITUTION AND HE HAS FAILED TO MAINTAIN PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN IT, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 100.3 (B) (1). 4.LENT THE PRESTIGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICE TO ADVANCE THE PRIVATE INTEREST OF THE JUDGES, OR OTHERS, IN VIOLATION OF RULES OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (22 NYCRR) SECTION 100.2 (C). 5.INFLICTED GRAVE MISUSE OF ONE'S OFFICIAL POSITION AS A METHOD OF OPERATION. 6.EXERCISED POWER HE DOES NOT LEGITIMATELY POSSESS. 7.INFLICTED A WILLFUL DISREGARD OF A JUDGE' S PROPER ROLE AND AUTHORITY 8. ATTEMPTED TO AND USURPED THE PEROGATIVES OF THE LEGISLATURE. 9. REBELLED AGAINST HIS SWORN OATH THAT HE WOULD DEFEND AND SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND WHICH SECURES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. Jonathan Lippman’s egregious unconstitutional criminal local and worldwide usurpations in the attached exhibits require the writing of this criminal complaint. I have studied, researched, and have been victimized by criminal unconstitutional Jonathan Lippman usurpation pattern and practices, for over 13 years. It is the grace of God as to why I and my family are still alive, as Jonathan Lippman’s documented unconstitutional, power crazed, lethal usurpations are deadly, a public safety threat to all living beings, are well documented and require his documented unconstitutional usurpation practices to be arrested immediately. Pursuant to NYCCRR 691.9 Jonathan Lippman should submit an admission that he can not successfully defend himself on the merits against the above specified charges. To this end, in addition to submitting this criminal complaint to authorities for his arrest as authorized, and on behalf of ending criminal seditious usurpations, I am sending a copy of this criminal complaint to Jonathan Lippman, pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and pursuant to his oath, as such I seek his written response to me, specific to the subject matter and I demand certified copies of all oaths filed, if any, for the record. His failure to respond to me, within 30 days , as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity, everything in this AFFIDAVIT OF TRUH CRIMINAL COMPLAINT with which he disagrees, is his lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this complaint is true, correct, legal, lawful and fully binding upon him in any court in America, without his protest or objection his silence is his acquiescence. See: Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. V. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” I am more than qualified to submit this criminal complaint Truth Affidavit as it is my testimony that lawless Jonathan Lippman usurpations kill under multiple disguises cited in each and every Documentary I have written and submitted to authorities. Above all, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation patterns have exemplified themselves in each and every aspect of my life and were the direct reasons mandating lawsuits I have filed where Constitutional and God given protections and rights were disregarded, similar to the lawless disregard in the Levenson case. Legal abuse, insurance fraud, racketeering, money laundering, defraud administration, statutory tenure obstructions, and pure obstruction of justice was prioritized in the below matters, patterning Jonathan Lippman's judicial trespass patterns and practices. He has masterminded and manifested a court system that further victimizes the victims, Snyder vs. Christine Stewart , University of Rochester Medical Center Affiliate, filed 1994 in The Supreme Court of The State Of New York County Of New York Index Number 131972/94 See Snyder v. Hempstead Public Schools et al , Second Circuit Court of Appeals; Docket No. 02-9386, In the Eastern District Court, Snyder v. Hempstead Public Schools Docket No. 02-3589, In the Southern District Court, Snyder v. Yonkers Public Schools, Docket No: 03 CIV. 0263. The Supreme Court of the Sate of New York Appellate Term: Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, HDW Apartments Index No: SP242/00 and 20001220NC. In each case I was boldly, lawlessly, ruthlessly and maliciously denied equal protection of the law. Jonathan Lippman is a power crazed, documented, criminal, lawless, unauthorized, unconstitutional lawless usurper of power he does not legitimately possess. His public record lawless usurpations are real, criminal, and are clear seditious acts to over throw the constitutional government and delay the execution of laws of the United States of America. His unconstitutional amendments, appeal, and legal fiction administration, are acts of insurrection against the Constitution by inciting and engaging rebellion against the Constitutional authority of the United States of America. The first question that needs to be publicly verified meaning written under oath and in his response letter to me is whether Jonathan Lippman has taken an oath to the federal and state Constitutions? If so, where are they filed? Second, does he possess a valid surety bond, on file for public scrutiny, pursuant to state statutes and in the performance of his official duties? If so, where? Third, does he believe that he is required to conduct his duties pursuant to and in compliance with that oath? To this end, I am forwarding this AFFIDAVIT to Jonathan Lippman in his official capacity. I am publicly SERVING via certified mail return receipt a copy of this verified criminal complaint against him in good faith seeking an end to the crimes cited above, and the multiple disguised killings that occur because of the disregard of the crimes cited at the top of this complaint. It is time Jonathan Lippman’s fictional, unconstitutional administration and deadly usurpations are arrested as required and allowed by the above authorities cited and the attached preponderance of evidence. Please note that in America, subversive elements within 'the Government' have created their own problems by repeatedly ignoring, subverting, perverting, and violating the fundamental Laws of this Nation and the interests of 'We, the People'. So 'We, the People' can correct the trouble by returning 'The United States Government' to the limits lawfully established for it by The Constitution-as-written for these united States of America and by the Constitutions-as-written of the respective States. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originated with the people, is founded upon their will and is instituted solely for their good. To establish due process, I respectfully request that Jonathan Lippman explains under oath in writing why his name is listed as the Deadly Pathogen leadership in the attached deadly pathogen programs that have left over 13 million dead under disguise. In addition, to establish due process, an explanation as to why his name is listed as an active member of the University of Rochester Medical Center infectious disease and emergency room departments? As questioned in the Documentaries I have written about Jonathan Lippman’s Multifaceted Can You Prove It While I Kill Operations, where are the viruses coming from that are funneled into the deadly pathogen programs listed under his name? Does he realize that there are over 13 million dead people under programs listed under his name? Does he have any idea how this happened? Please review the two documents listing court administration as a phenomenon and listing pathogen administration as a phenomenon. How did this happen? Jonathan Lippman’s verifiable response is sought as lawless usurped powers have been used to deny fair investigations and delay his arrest. Consequently, I am submitting this complaint to authorities for an independent non usurped investigation into the crimes mentioned above that obstruct justice, terrorize nations, and people, and kill under multiple disguises. I am submitting a copy to Jonathan Lippman to establish due process as stated above. I am tired of Jonathan Lippman’s public record documented criminal usurpations that are being silenced lawlessly without any Constitutional authority, against public policy allowing him continual above the law treatment that serves no other purpose but to facilitate his multiple disguised killing operations, of which I am under right now via lawless usurped governmental obstructions documented in the above offices cited. I will not end up dead under any of Jonathan Lippman documented disguised killing operations via lawless usurped unauthorized powers that he does not legitimately possess. At present, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation patterns have been inflicted to deny me every monetary entitlement due me. God is a provider and I did not need to be under the control of Jonathan Lippman’s monetary exploitation and usurpation power, to hinder this needed complaint on behalf of the human race and life without Jonathan Lippman deadly usurpations. Though the genocide project listed under his name targets and executes people of color in the millions via the pathogens listed under his name, he is also administering other deadly pathogens for white people, mainly for judges, lawyers, and people in positions of power. See the attached documentation of lawless usurpation in the American Federation of Teachers after being warned. If members of the judiciary think lawless usurpations, will not impact them, they had really better think twice, because crime is contagious. No one is exempt as long as Jonathan Lippman’s documented usurpation crimes are disregarded. Challenge Jonathan Lippman and thereafter make an appointment with a doctor. You will not come out the doctors office the way you went in and to disguise the phenomenon, he may order a time release pathogen to finish you off. The two billion dollar unregulated budget is inhumane and produces inhumane results. Look at the epidemics and disturbances listed under his name. Attached you will find Jonathan Lippman’s name in the search engine of the University of Rochester Medical Center and emergency room. This is where trauma patients are placed. Thereafter, they are placed via lawless, expert, well financed, usurped design, they are placed in the control tower, the infectious disease department, where the attached pathogens listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name are created. All it takes to make the attached Jonathan Lippman named deadly pathogen phenomenon work is one corrupted virologist/medical RESEARCHER. In fact, with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget, multiple corrupted virologists will line up! In fact, multiple corrupted virologist are needed to facilitate the disguise, nondisclosure and to perfect an ongoing conspiracy against rights. With this plan, the only evidence is the bodies and it looks like a bonafide PHENOMENON, Jonathan Lippman thought! To facilitate a description of one of Jonathan Lippman’s named and titled Deadly Pathogen phenomenon, I will present an example of how it works based on my research of this Jonathan Lippman lawless usurpation based Can You Prove It, While I Kill Phenomena. This example will show how Jonathan Lippman’s Disguised Killing phenomena works non eugenically. In other words I will describe Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing for the general public. When Jonathan Lippman’s Disguised Killing Phenomena Operations are killing non eugenically, the motive is usually for a position of power and control, at times, revenge, and for whistle blowing. The seed/ROOT of ALL of his multifaceted disguised killing phenomena operations is based in LAWLESS USURPATIONS which his unregulated budget makes easy. I have documented the revenge and whistle blowing Jonathan Lippman disguised killing patterns in the Documentaries I have written. For example, let’s say Jonathan Lippman had his eye on John Walker, the former Second Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Justice position. He wants to control that office, but Mr. Walker is experienced so he can only go but so far. This is a problem to Jonathan Lippman because he wants to control that office. Consequently, a phenomenon must be implemented to get rid of Mr. Walker. Jonathan Lippman can not just kill him. That would be too obvious. Consequently, a phenomenon must be implemented that will rid Chief Justice Walker because Jonathan Lippman wants control of that office in its entirety. Please note this office is where the criminal seditious usurpations were disregarded. Consequently, Mr. Walker goes home one night and miraculously a phenomenon occurred. This phenomenon compelled Mr. Walker to resign. Mr. Walker was in a miraculous car accident that no one can explain. The person Mr. Walker hit in the car accident, a police officer, miraculously died under a hospitalized emergency room phenomena. The notes to the accident say Mr. Walker was driving slowly in the rain. Yet, this police officer miraculously died appearing from the car accident, yet Mr. Walker was driving slowly. The phenomena include a miraculous accident and now a miraculous death, another human life lost under a phenomena. Further phenomena are the police officer died from unknown causes. Follow the dots, for those who know my Documentaries. All of these phenomena miraculously opened the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Justice office and guess who had his eye on that office all along. Since, the man that Chief Justice Walker hit was white, a cop, and died, somebody had to pay. Immediately after the above inflicted Chief Justice Walker phenomenon killing, a miraculously erupted NYC, police shooting spree occurred in which a black man was killed by over fifty police shootings under a phenomenon. Nobody knows why this man was shot, much more so many times. However, there is a causal relationship between the timing of this phenomenon and the John Walker phenomenon. We have two dead bodies under a phenomenon, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals office rid of Mr. Walker and the people in New York State are pitted against each other. While the people of New York are pitted, and two innocent men are dead, Jonathan Lippman’s mission is accomplished. The Chief Justice position is vacant. While the people of New York are pitted against each other, he is busy fictionizing the vacant Chief Justice position. The reality is you have an innocent dead police officer and an innocent dead black man all orchestrated to create a vacancy, subterfuge the hospital police killing and pit the people of New York. Guess what? With this inflicted havoc and dead bodies, no one is monitoring this newly created Chief Justice vacancy but Jonathan Lippman. The timing of such and killing a black man to soften the hospital killing of the Jonathan Lippman target cop, exemplifies how this operation works. There are two innocent dead men killed under phenomena and Chief Judge Walker’s position became vacant under a phenomenon. This is not court administration. This is dark forces black magic phenomena administration. It is spiritual wickedness in high places. Read the Bible, specifically, Ephesians 6 verse 12. FOR WE WRESTLE NOT AGAINST FLESH AND BLOOD, BUT AGAINST PRINCIPALITIES, AGAINST POWERS, AGAINST THE RULERS OF THE DARKNESS OF THIS WORLD, AGAINST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES. END OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN PHENOMENA. HE IS A FALLEN ANGEL AND MUST BE NOTED AS SUCH. Based on my research of Jonathan Lippman’s killing operations, this is how the operation works and for every white person they kill, black people must pay in multitudes. The pattern is too extensive to detail now. However, this is a clear example of what and how Jonathan Lippman lawless power and control usurpation Disguised Killing phenomenon entails. Remember this was an example, but the truth of the matter is, the above example opened the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Office and Jonathan Lippman is having a fiesta! In fact since this opening, the inflicted lawless usurpations have escalated to a level unimaginable, requiring this complaint. The Jonathan Lippman Can You Prove It While I kill Disguised Killing Operations all end with Dead people and Can You Prove it phenomena. Pursuant to my research, the phenomena are easily inflicted via black magic and using dark forces to manage enterprises and people. The police officer was killed for no other reason but to, push and make sure Mr. Walker retires, leaves office. See attachments. Again, the Jonathan Lippman plan worked effectively. We have a cop killed under hospital phenomena and a black man killed by a cop under phenomena. Miraculously, phenomena created Chief Justice Walker’s vacancy and the people of NYC are so busy being pitted against each other that nobody but Jonathan Lippman is monitoring Chief Justice Walker’s vacancy. Phenomenon administration is Jonathan Lippman’s only expertise, but with a two billion dollar unregulated budget, the phenomena gets perfected. Jonathan Lippman gets to control the Second Circuit Court of Appeals by his very own design. Tell the truth and shame the devil! Even though Mr. Walker former Chief judge of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, did me wdisregarded several Jonathan Lippman complaints I filed, I still feel sorry for him. He is sitting home blinking his eyes wondering what happened. Guess what, he was set up and forced out of his position via phenomenon embedded in lawless usurpations that kill under multiple disguises. Mr. Walker needs to thank God he is related to the president of the United States or he would have been killed under a phenomena just like so many other innocent people, because this is what Jonathan Lippman does best. It is the disguise, inflicted phenomena, and reactions to such that intrigues Jonathan Lippman. Jonathan Lippman can not understand why his phenomenon does nothing for or to me. It does nothing to or for me because God rescued me multiple times from Jonathan Lippman’s patterned and practiced deadly phenomena seeded from lawless usurpations. In fact, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless phenomena and lawless administration of phenomena, particularly through enterprises, compels me to document. Above all, Jonathan Lippman's deadly phenomenon, seeded through lawless usurpations intrigue me because I serve the living ALMIGHTY, ALL POWERFUL, ALL RIGHTEOUS God and not the god of worship and money in exchange for freedom, health and sovereignty. The above is one of many of Jonathan Lippman’s disguised killing operations. No one could make this up. Jonathan Lippman is operating multiple generational multifaceted disguised killing operations premised off of lawless and deadly usurpations, that kill under disguise effectively. He knows I am probably the only survivor. Consequently, the only one that can do what I am doing and have been doing on behalf of public safety, is me. Consequently, via lawless usurpations, he has masterminded having me wiped off this earth. But, he forgot that ALMIGHTY GOD IS IN CHARGE OF THIS EARTH AND THAT IS THE ONLY REASON I AND MY FAMILY ARE ALIVE. CONSEQUENTLY, I MUST PROCLAIM THE TRUTH AND THE POWER OF ALMIGHTY GOD THAT HAS RESCUED ME FROM MULTIPLE JONATHAN LIPPMAN PATTERNED AND PRACTICED DEADLY PHENONMENON EMBEDDED AND CONTINUED BECAUSE OF DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATION DISREGARD. Research shows that Jonathan Lippman via lawlessly usurped powers and the disregard of such has many disguised killing operations. In fact, it is my sworn testimony that I am under one now, whereas he has lawlessly usurped power in every aspect of my life to leave me to die under the disguise of financial demise. Please note I did not ask for this assignment. Jonathan Lippman’s constant and repeated, inflicted, criminal, life threatening, lawless usurpation patterns and practices required documentation and the ramifications of his global inflicted criminal usurpation pattern and practices require publicity. Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal usurpations are beyond interferences with state and federal laws, they are disregarded monstrous crimes that have effectuated millions of homicides and I am not next. Malicious lawless usurpations have been inflicted in every aspect of my life with emphasis on the judiciary. This can not be silenced as it should not have occurred. This abuse of power via lawless usurpations is evidenced in my bank accounts, every job I have had, every court case I have had to initiate to regulate and document usurpation crimes. Lawless usurpations have been inflicted on me in a most retaliatory manner and are most obvious at the judiciary level. See attachments. These abuses profoundly violate the public's trust in the judiciary. Jonathan Lippman has had an injection waiting for me in the hospital for 13 years and he had better realize that, that injection will get to him in jail before it ever reaches me. He is mad because his disguised killing operations listed under his name are well financed, expert, and effective. Yet, they have not and will not work over here. Psychotic pathogen administration, coupled with an unregulated 2 billion dollar budget, coupled with documented seditious, defrauding rulings, appeals, amendments, and tendencies, is a formula for Global destruction, fraudulent court and people manipulation and control, under the disguise of a social phenomenon. Finally, I urge every one reading this to demand that congress legislate laws that monitor and control pathogen creation, production, and dissemination, as a public safety method, just like boxers and other people with deadly skills must register. Pathogen regulation public protections must be put in place so the over 13 million people that died in programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name, as well as the former American Federation of Teachers Union President, who I forewarned and was killed thereafter under the phenomenon I warned her of, the, Hempstead Public Schools Union lawyer was killed under a pathogen phenomenon after helping negotiate a settlement to offset Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations, the police officer, who died under the hospital’s control in Judge Walker’s case and the many other disguised killing victims I have detailed in my Documentaries will not continue. It is my prayer that investigations of the above disguised killings will be conducted via the hospital, via the doctors assigned to each of the above and via the specialist assigned, where did the specialist come from and their bank accounts since the above killings. This information may relay most useful information. I have studied and researched Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpation based Disguised Killing Operations phenomenon very well. They can be further dismantled via people on earth utilizing their God given skills and authority, to make this quote: thine is the Kingdom, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven, a reality. Jonathan Lippman and his retinue of demons required exposure. As such, I pray that we the people will restore order back to our governments on earth, where we the people, human beings, have God given authority to build this nation and world pursuant to, in accordance with God’s the Almighty Creator’s laws. In summary, wickedness has been utilized as a method of management, equal protection of the law has been obstructed, non existent, lawlessly usurped and denied because New York State has a documented judicial trespasser/usurper and disguised killer, that has been killing under disguise for years, does not want to stop, is running a pattern of racketeering via grave misuse of one's official position in multiple enterprises, manipulating an unregulated budget as a method of usurpation operation, coupled with exercising powers he does not legitimately possess. Jonathan Lippman’s appeal is a direct act to over throw government. His involving other judges in his unauthorized fiction based amendment is an act of subornation of perjury by procuring another to commit perjury. His unconstitutional appeal and amendment exemplify fraud by a judge, the disregard of his unconstitutional amendment and appeal are racketeering patterns and practices and misprision of treason and felonies. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless acts mount up to felonies of sedition, rebellion against the Constitutional government and the people, aggravating and gross genocide conspiracies, and obstruction of state, federal, and international public protection laws. Above all, as established in US Code Title 10, Section 333, Jonathan Lippman’s LAWLESS USURPATION PATTERNS, PRACTICES, AND AFFILIATIONS HAVE CAUSED SEVERAL DEADLY PUBLIC ATROCITIES AND DISTURBANCES THAT CAN NOT BE OVER LOOKED. Jonathan Lippman titled SOCIAL PHENOMENON must be investigated, while he is arrested for all the crimes in the Levenson matter. Answers as to why is Jonathan Lippman’s name listed as the leadership of documented Genocidal Pathogenic Programs is needed for the public record, on behalf of all of America and public safety across the world. I look forward to Jonathan Lippman’s verified response in the interest of due process, as due process is something I have never had when my incomes were lawlessly usurped multiple times. However, as a good faith courtesy, I am extending it to Jonathan Lippman and look forward to his verified response to this affidavit. The multiple disguised killings via economic lawless usurpations, genocidal lawless usurpations, deadly cancer pathogenic usurpations, court lawless usurpations, bank account lawless usurpations, public education lawless usurpations, lawless teacher union usurpations, criminal investigation and judicial lawless usurpations, all have to stop on behalf of life pursuant to God given rights and authority. Jonathan Lippman has demonstrated a pattern of willful disregard of a judge’s proper role and authority. He has usurped the prerogatives of the legislature repeatedly and has rebelled against his sworn oath that he would defend and support the Constitution, the supreme law of this land which secures equal protection of the laws. I urge each public official to act competently, as Jonathan Lippman’s lawless usurpations demise, not just in the legal systems, but worldwide as exemplified in the attachments. I have attached the following documents: 1. 1 No. 1: Leonard J. Levenson, et al. v. Jonathan Lippman,&c., et al. 2.Some Lawyers For the Poor Refuse Cases, A Jonathan Lippman Design 3.For the Poor, a Lawyer With 1,600 Clients, 4.Jonathan Lippman unauthorized, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, POWER CRAZED, lawless usurpation letter to Allen Hevesi, dated June 7, 2005 5.Jonathan Lippman lawless and unconstitutional usurped power minimization of judicial wrongdoing investigation offices with no Constitutional authority, abusively controlling and silencing judicial wrongdoing investigations. 6.Jonathan Lippman legal Fiction administration and disturbance letter to him dated March 27, 2006 from Andrea Masley. This letter documents the ramifications of unconstitutional, personal gain, power craze, havoc causing, Jonathan Lippman rulings. 7.Jonathan Lippman’s constructed usurpation regulator document dated September 18, 2006, 8.Jonathan Lippman’s patterned lawless usurped powers inflicting lawless income executions and judicial equal protection of the law denial via Jonathan Lippman patterned usurped SYNDER Code, in the judiciary. 9.Jonathan Lippman documentation describing court administration as PHENOMENON, in his Report of the New York State Court System Electronic Filing Pilot Program, 10. Deadly Pathogen Programs listed under Jonathan Lippman’s name and describing deadly pathogen administration as a PHENOMENON. 11. The Constitution of New York 1777, AMERICANS FIGHTING OFF LAWLESS USURPATIONS THAT LAWLESSLY ENSLAVE VIA USURPATIONS AND FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION This Criminal Complaint Affidavit is a public appeal to arrest Jonathan Lippman’s criminal, lawlessly inflicted and usurped mayhem, turbulence, public obstruction of the peace, inflicted evil, and monstrous obstruction of safety disturbances via lawless and deadly usurpations that are documented in the courts of New York State and in the death rates of programs with his name. See attached. In closing, the attached documents, court records, Jonathan Lippman’s lawless unconstitutional, unauthorized, ungodly, inhumane actions validate the crimes decreed in this complaint which require, mandate, and compel the arrest of Jonathan Lippman’s Global enemy of humankind and humanity lawless and scandalous administration of legal fictions under the disguise of law. This complaint is not personal. It is not against the system. It is on behalf of public safety, the human race living free from inflicted and disregarded deadly, wicked, eugenic, monstrous usurpations disguised as phenomena that have effectuated varied Global and in the United States of America disguised killings and atrocities that could have been and can be prevented. Jonathan Lippman’s lawless actions attaching him to the above statement, as well as the attachments attached, exemplify engagement in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, conduct detrimental to the safety of human kind, and the disregard of the deadly ramifications of such inflicted heinous crimes, indicates that he is unable to discharge all the duties of office by reason of mental disability and probable insanity. THIS IS AN EXTRA COPY OF THE NOTARIZED PAGE. There is no need to determine whether Jonathan Lippman’s conduct was unlawful (see Penal Law 195.00 [Official Misconduct]; 195.05 [Obstructing Governmental Administration]; 205.50 [Hindering Prosecution]) since, manifestly, behavior that even raises such questions is inconsistent with the role of a judge and brings the judiciary into disrepute. See, Matter of Backal v. Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 87 NY2d 1 (1995); Matter of Gibbons v. Comm. on Judicial Conduct, 98 NY2d 448 (2002). It should not be difficult to arrest, remove and impeach Jonathan Lippman to end his documented lawless judicial usurpations that inflicted and disguised Hitler type atrocities. On behalf of global public safety one must conclude that the sanction of arrest and removal softens the penalties warranted. Above all, I thank God for Equal Protections secured by God. However, it is time that the Equal Protection clause of the United States of America Constitution begins to be enforced on behalf of local and international public safety, public policy, government reform and restoration from Jonathan Lippman damages, and on behalf of humanity. Constitutional protections should have been and must begin to be enforced to arrest these documented, Jonathan Lippman, deadly, public safety, scandalous, wicked, lawless usurpations, inflicted psychotic power and control atrocities. No one is above the law. Jonathan Lippman’s actions appear to be of Fallen Angels' = 'Felon Agents', A Dios! The earth belongs to Almighty Sovereign God the Creator! Thank you. ATTESTATION: I ATTEST TO THE FACT, THAT ON THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2007, I, MIRIAM SNYDER, APPEARED BEFORE THE NOTARY BELOW AND SIGNED THE BELOW, OF MY OWN FREE WILL. I HAVE PREPARED, RESEARCHED, AND SIGNED THIS CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/AFFIDAVIT AND THE STATEMENTS PRESENTED ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. _____________________________________________ MIRIAM SNYDER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVE PUBLIC AFFIDAVIT DOCUMENTING DEMAND THAT EACH PUBLIC OFFICIAL LISTED ON THE ATTACHED JONATHAN LIPPMAN CRIMINAL COMPLAINT READ ALL OF THE ATTACHED COMPLAINT PLEADINGS AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN AND ADHERE ONLY TO CONSTITUTIONALLY COMPLIANT LAW AND CASE LAW, AND MORE PARTICULARLY, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, IN THE ARREST, REMOVAL AND IMPEACHMENT RULINGS COMES NOW Miriam Snyder, Affiant and respectfully demands that each public official listed on the attached Jonathan Lippman criminal complaint, pursuant to their oaths sworn by and their duties to the Constitution, in any and all proceedings in this complaint: 1.To read, consider, comprehend and rule upon the Jonathan Lippman Judicial Trespass criminal complaint based only in and supported by laws, statutes and case law in agreement with, and not in opposition or contradiction to, the National Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; 2.To honor, uphold and abide by the oaths taken by the public officials, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article VI, Clauses 2 and 3, and Constitutional requirements thereof; 3.Pursuant to those oaths, to base and support his arrest, removal and or impeachment in law or case law which is Constitutionally compliant and which will not: (A) deny the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the National Constitution; (B) deny Constitutional Rights to American Citizens, in the instant case, the people of New York State (C) violate federal and/or state Constitutionally compliant laws; (D) shield, exonerate or hold Jonathan Lippman’s trespass and documented criminal and unconstitutional acts as a judge, harmless and immune from violating federal or state laws, federal or State Constitutions, violating New Yorkers Constitutional Rights and Rights of due process of law, wrongdoing(s), crimes, criminal activity(ies), fraud, collusion and conspiracy, insurrection, sedition and anarchy. 4.To acknowledge that American Citizens, in the instant case, People living in New York State, are Sovereign in this Nation, and that the government, this, and other entities of government serve the American Citizens pursuant to: (A) limited powers delegated from the Constitution, which delegated powers are derived from the People; (B) oaths taken to uphold the Constitution; (C) the Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; (D) powers authorized only by the Constitution or laws in full compliance therewith, specifically, the Bill of Rights, and (E) acknowledge that lack of Constitutional authority precludes any action and voids any ruling by Jonathan Lippman and or any other public servant imposture. Wherefore, since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, to which each public official is sworn, Affiant, Miriam Snyder, respectfully demands these Honorable Public Officials to exercise Constitutionally required power to arrest, remove and impeach, accordingly, Jonathan Lippman, for his documented lawless usurpations, unconstitutional acts and rulings against the people of New York, with particularity to his documented unconstitutional criminal usurpations documented in : 1 NO. 1: LEONARD J. LEVENSON, ET AL. V. JONATHAN LIPPMAN,&C., ET AL.. The below are some of Jonathan Lippman’s documented criminal acts that mandate, authorize and require this criminal complaint and his arrest, removal and impeachment accordingly: •CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, 18 USC SEC 371, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, 18 USC SEC. 1621 • • EXTRA PAGE •INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,18 USC SEC 2383 •SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18 USC SEC 2384 •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, 18 USC SEC 1509, •SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) Affiant, Miriam Snyder respectfully requests that each Public Official listed in Jonathan Lippman’s criminal complaint read the complaint vigilantly and rule based in and supported by the federal Constitution, for the aforesaid reasons, to honor and uphold the Constitution and rule based only in law and case law compliant with, and not in opposition or contradictory to, the Constitution. Respectfully submitted, All Rights Reserved ________________________________ Miriam Snyder 516 642-6007 SUPREMACY The supremacy clause, United States Constitutional Article VI declares that all laws made in pursuance of the Constitution and all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land and shall enjoy legal superiority over any conflicting provision of a State constitution or law. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 8TH day of March, 2007, a true and exact copy of the above Affidavit and Jonathan Lippman Criminal Complaint Affidavit of Truth was sent, first class postage prepaid, by U.S. mail, to Independent Ministers Across The Country Chief Judge Judith Kaye 230 Park Avenue, Suite 826 New York City, New York 10169-0007 John Conyers, Committee on the Judiciary US House of Representatives Washington Office 2426 RHOB Washington, D.C. 20515-2214 Maxine Waters, Committee on the Judiciairy US House of Representatives 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Charles Schumer U.S. Senator 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Hillary Clinton, U.S. Senator 780 3rd Avenue New York, New York 10017 Robert Johnson Bronx District Attorney 198 East 161st Bronx, New York 10451 Andrew Cuomo, NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 NYC Mayor Bloomberg 100 Church Street New York, New York 10007 Rose Gill Hearn, Commissioner City of New York Department of Investigation 80 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Raoul Lionel Felder, Administrator New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct NOTARIZED COPY EXTRA PAGE 61 Broadway New York, New York 1006 Jonathan Lippman Disguised Killer and Judicial Trespasser 25 Beaver Street New York, New York 10004 All Rights Reserved _________________________________ Miriam Snyder, American ______________________________________________________________ MORANDUM OF LAW SUPPORTING THE ATTACHED VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AGAINST NYS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR JUDICIAL TRESPASSER JONATHAN LIPPMAN MIRIAM SNYDER MARCH 8, 2007 JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S PUBLIC CRIME LIST CHARGES: • CONSPIRACY TO OFFEND AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES, ( 18 USC SEC 371), EX:THE BELOW MENTIONED LEVENSON MATTER, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL INVALID RULE 127, HIS APPEAL, HIS RULINGS IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE, UNCONSTITUIONAL USURPED COURT AND LEGISLATIVE POWERS AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS A PHENOMENON, •PERJURY AGAINST HIS OATH OF OFFICE BY SUBSCRIBING TO A MATERIAL HE KNOWS TO BE FALSE, ( 18 USC SEC. 1621), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •INSURRECTION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION BY INCITING, ASSISSTING, AND ENGAGING IN REBELLION AGAINST THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2383) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS AMENDMENT, HIS APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC REDORD APPELLATE DIVISION DOCUMENTED LAWLESS USURPATIONS, •SEDITION/SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY BY CONSPIRING TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT OR DELAY THE EXECUTION OF A LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ( 18 USC SEC 2384 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S RULE 127.B, HIS LAWLESSLY USURPED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, APPEAL AND RULINGS IN THE ATTACHMENTS, JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S ATTACHED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPATIONS AND APPEAL, •IMPEDING DUE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS BY ATTEMPTING TO PREVENT, OBSTRUCT, IMPEDE, AND INTERFERE WITH SAME, (18 USC SEC 1509) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S LAWLESS USURPATION LAWLESSLY IMPEDED AND OBSTRUCTED THE ASISTANCE OF COUNSELCONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED PROGRAM AND PAYMENT PLAN, •SUBORNATION OF PERJURY BY PROCURING ANOTHER TO COMMIT PERJURY ,(18 USC SEC. 1622 ) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN ENJOINING SUBORDINATE JUDGES IN HIS LEGAL FICTION ADMINISTRATION VIA ENFORCING HIS PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED LAWLESS USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULE 127, WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY EFFECTUATING MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON MATTER, •FRAUD BY A JUDGE BY MAKING A FALSE REPRESENTATION, WRITING A FALSE DOCUMENT OR HAVING KNOWLEDGE THAT A DOCUMENT IS FALSE, MAKING A FALSE DECLARATION BEFORE A UNITED STATES COURT (18 USC SEC 1623 ), EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL IN THE LEVENSON MATTER, •RACKETEERING BY CONDUCTING AN ONGOING ENTERPRISE OF BRIBERY, EXTORTION, OR THREATS OF SAME, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962); EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND THE ATTACHED PATHOGENIC RACQUETEERING ENTERPRISES LISTED UNDER HIS NAME, •CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF SOVERIEGN, FREE, GOD CREATED, CITIZENS, ( 18, SECTION 241 ) EX: OVER 13 MILLION DEADHERE AND ABROAD UNDER HIS NAME AND PATHOGENIC LEADERSHIP, PUBLIC PROTESTS VIA MULTIPLE LAWSUITS FILED AGAINST JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S USURPED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, CONSOLIDATED INTO THE LEVENSON LAW SUIT, • U.S. CODE TITLE 10, SECTION 333, INTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS , EX: THE DISREGARD OF JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S DOCUMENTED PUBLIC RECORD LAWLESS USURPED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE UNAUTHORIZED AMENDMENT WHICH EFFECTUATED MULTIPLE PUBLIC PROTEST LAWSUITS AND DISTURBANCES IS A DIRECT INTERFERENCE AND OBSTRUCTION OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE LACK OF CONSTITUTIONAL EQUAL PROTECTIONS HAS EFFECTUATED OVER 13 MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE DEAD UNDER A JONATHAN LIPPMAN TITLED PHENOMENON. JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S FICTIONAL ADMINISTRATION, COUPLED WITH LAWLESS UNRESTRAINED USURPATIONS, IS AN OBSTRUCTION WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND HAS CAUSED PUBLIC DISTURBANCE MULTIPLE LAWSUITS. THE DISREGARD OF SUCH, AS WELL AS THE DISREGARD OF EQUAL PROTECTIONS SECURED BY GOD AND THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRE INTERVENTION, •ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT, (18 U.S.C. SEC. 1962) EX: JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S APPEAL, RULINGS, LAWLESS PUBLIC RECORD DOCUMENTED USURPATIONS AND AMMENDMENTS WITH NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE ATTACHED LEVENSON MATTER AND ATTACHMENTS, •GENOCIDE; (B) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (C) DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (D) ATTEMPT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE; (E) COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE, EXAMPLE: THE ATTACHED GENOCIDAL DEADLY PATHOGEN PROGRAMS LISTED UNDER JONATHAN LIPPMAN’S NAME AND TITLE AS PHENOMENON COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD AND DESTROY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A NATIONAL, ETHNICAL, RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS GROUP AS SUCH: (A) KILLING MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (B) CAUSING SERIOUS BODILY OR MENTAL HARM TO MEMBERS OF THE GROUP; (C) DELIBERATELY INFLICTING ON THE GROUP CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO BRING ABOUT ITS PHYSICAL DESTRUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART; (D) IMPOSING MEASURES INTENDED TO PREVENT BIRTHS WITHIN THE GROUP; TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 4 4. MISPRISION OF FELONY Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2382 2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2383 2383. REBELLION OR INSURRECTION Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2384 2384. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2385 2385. ADVOCATING OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 371 371. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1621 1621. PERJURY GENERALLY Whoever (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, united states code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1622 1622. SUBORNATION OF PERJURY Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 2384 2384. SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. T ITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 1509 18 USC 1509. OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ORDERS Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 79 1623 1623. FALSE DECLARATIONS BEFORE GRAND JURY OR COURT (a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. (b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States. (c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if (1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and (2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged under this section. In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true. Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed. (e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 96 1962 1962. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES: RACKETEERING (a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more directors of the issuer. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section. TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 13 241 241. CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured. They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. TITLE 10 Subtitle A PART I CHAPTER 15 333. Interference with State and Federal law The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. AUTHORITY: CHAPTER 15 OF TITLE 10 U.S.C. (10 U.S.C. 331 ET SEQ.). Source: 37 FR 3637, Feb. 18, 1972, unless otherwise noted. 215.1 Purpose and scope. This part establishes uniform Department of Defense policies, assigns responsibilities, and furnishes general guidance for utilizing DoD military and civilian personnel, facilities, equipment or supplies: (a) In support of civil authorities during civil disturbances within the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. (b) In other related instances where military resources may be used to protect life or Federal property or to prevent disruption of Federal functions. 215.2 Applicability. This part is applicable to all components of the Department of Defense (the Military Departments, Organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Defense Agencies, and the unified and specified commands) having cognizance over military resources which may be utilized in accordance with the policies set forth herein. 215.3 Definitions. (a) Civil disturbances are group acts of violence and disorders prejudicial to public law and order within the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. The term civil disturbance includes all domestic conditions requiring the use of Federal armed forces pursuant to the provisions of chapter 15 of Title 10, United States Code. (b) Federal property is that property which is owned, leased, possessed, or occupied by the Federal Government. (c) Military resources include military and civilian personnel, facilities, equipment, and supplies under the control of a DOD component. (d) A Federal function is any function, operation, or action carried out under the laws of the United States by any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or by an officer or employee thereof. 215.4 Legal considerations. (a) Under the Constitution and laws of the United States, the protection of life and property and the maintenance of public order are primarily the responsibilities of State and local governments, which have the necessary authority to enforce the laws. The Federal Government may assume this responsibility and this authority only in certain limited instances. (b) Aside from the constitutional limitations of the power of the Federal Government at the local level, there are additional legal limits upon the use of military forces within the United States. The most important of these from a civil disturbance standpoint is the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. 1385), which prohibits the use of any part of the Army or the Air Force to execute or enforce the laws, except as authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. (c) The Constitution and Acts of Congress establish six exceptions, generally applicable within the entire territory of the United States, to which the Posse Comitatus Act prohibition does not apply. (1) The constitutional exceptions are two in number and are based upon the inherent legal right of the U.S. Governmenta sovereign national entity under the Federal Constitutionto insure the preservation of public order and the carrying out of governmental operations within its territorial limits, by force if necessary. (i) The emergency authority. Authorities prompt and vigorous Federal action, including use of military forces, to prevent loss of life or wanton destruction of property and to restore governmental functioning and public order when sudden and unexpected civil disturbances, disasters, or calamities seriously endanger life and property and disrupt normal governmental functions to such an extent that duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situations. (ii) Protection of Federal property and functions. Authorizes Federal action, including the use of military forces, to protect Federal property and Federal governmental functions when the need for protection exists and duly constituted local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection. (2) There are four exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act based on Acts of Congress. (i) In the cases of each of the first three of those described, paragraphs (c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c) of this section, personal Presidential action, including the issuance of a proclamation calling upon insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably within a limited time, is a prerequisite. (a) 10 U.S.C. 331. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces when a State is unable to control domestic violence, and a request for Federal assistance has been made by the State legislature or governor to the President. Implements Article IV, section 4, of the Constitution. (b) 10 U.S.C. 332. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces to enforce Federal law when unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States renders ordinary enforcement means unworkable. Implements Article II, section 3, of the Constitution. (c) 10 U.S.C. 333. Authorizes use of the militia and Armed Forces when domestic violence or conspiracy hinders execution of State or Federal law, and a State cannot or will not protect the constitutional rights of the citizens. Implements Article II, section 3, and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. (d) House Joint Resolution 1292, June 6, 1968. 1 Directs all departments of the Government, upon the request of the Secret Service, to assist that Service in carrying out its statutory duties to protect Government officials and major political candidates from physical harm. Assistance to the Secret Service is governed by DoD Directive 3025.13, “Employment of Department of Defense Resources in Support of the United States Secret Service,” July 15, 1968. 2 1 Although this resolution has been placed in the Statutes at Large as Public Law 90331, 82 Stat. 170, it has not been codified; it is set out in the notes to 18 U.S.C. 3056. 2 Filed as part of original copies available from U.S. Naval Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19120, Code: 300. (ii) It should be noted that none of the above authorities, in and of itself, provides sufficient legal basis to order members of the Reserve components to active Federal service. 215.5 Policies. (a) The employment of DoD military resources for assistance to civil authorities in controlling civil disturbances will normally be predicated upon the issuance of a Presidential Executive order or Presidential directive authorizing and directing the Secretary of Defense to provide for the restoration of law and order in a specific State or locality. Exceptions to this condition will be limited to: (1) Cases of sudden and unexpected emergencies as described in 215.4(c)(1)(i), which require that immediate military action be taken. (2) Providing military resources to civil authorities as prescribed in 215.9 of this part. (b) The Attorney General of the United States has been designated to receive and coordinate preliminary requests from States for Federal military assistance authorized by 10 U.S.C. 331 (215.4(c)(2)(i)(a)). Formal requests from States for such aid will be made to the President, who will determine what Federal action will be taken. (c) The Secretary of the Army is delegated any and all of the authority of the President under chapter 15 of title 10, U.S.C. (215.4(c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c)) which has been or may be hereafter delegated by the President to the Secretary of Defense. (d) The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force are delegated all that authority which has been or may be hereafter delegated by the President to the Secretary of Defense to order to active duty, units and members of the Reserve Components under their respective jurisdictions, except National Guard units and members, for use pursuant to chapter 15 of title 10, U.S.C. (215.4(c)(2)(i) (a), (b), and (c)). (e) DoD components and their subordinate activities will coordinate with local civil authorities or local military commanders as appropriate, to assure mutual understanding of the policies and procedures to be adhered to in an actual or anticipated civil disturbance situation. (f) DoD civilian employees generally should not be used to assist civil authorities in connection with civil disturbances, except as provided for in 215.9(b)(3). (g) The propositioning of more than a battalion-sized unit, as authorized in 215.6(a) (6), will be undertaken only with the approval of the President. Requests for the propositioning of forces will be addressed to the Attorney General. 215.6 Responsibilities. (a) The Secretary of the Army is designated as the Executive Agent for the Department of Defense in all matters pertaining to the planning for, and the deployment and employment of military resources in the event of civil disturbances. As DoD Executive Agent, the Secretary of the Army (or the Under Secretary of the Army, as his designee) is responsible for: (1) Providing policy and direction concerning plans, procedures, and requirements to all DoD components having cognizance over military resources which may be employed under the provisions of this part. (2) Improving and evaluating the capabilities of the National Guard to deal with civil disturbances. (3) Establishing DoD policies and procedures for: (i) Calling the National Guard to active Federal service and ordering the National Guard and other Reserve